
BUSH ADMINISTRATION SUED TO FORCE POLAR BEAR PROTECTION
Date: Wednesday, March 12 @ 11:27:05 EDT Topic: Legal & Regulatory
Monday the Center for Biological Diversity, Greenpeace, and the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC) sued the Bush administration for
missing its legal deadline for issuing a final decision on whether to
list the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act due to global
warming.
“The Bush administration seems intent on slamming shut the narrow
window of opportunity we have to save polar bears,” said Kassie Siegel,
climate program director at the Center for Biological Diversity and
lead author of the 2005 petition seeking the Endangered Species Act
listing. “We simply will not sit back and passively allow the
administration to condemn polar bears to extinction.”
Polar bears live only in the Arctic and are totally dependent on the
sea ice for all of their essential needs. The rapid warming of the
Arctic and melting of the sea ice pose an overwhelming threat to the
polar bear, which could become the first mammal to lose 100 percent of
its habitat to global warming.
The groups filed their lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California. The lawsuit seeks a court order compelling the
administration to issue the final decision on polar bear protection
immediately.
“The Endangered Species Act is absolutely unambiguous: the Fish and
Wildlife Service was required to make a final decision months ago. Now
it’s up to a federal court to throw this incredible animal a lifeline,”
said Andrew Wetzler, director of NRDC’s Endangered Species Project. “We
need urgent action from this administration to protect the polar bear
and reduce greenhouse gas pollution, not continued delay.”
Noting that the federal government initiated lease sales to drill for
oil in the Chukchi Sea earlier this month, Kert Davies, research
director at Greenpeace USA, said: “Our lawsuit has forced the Bush
administration’s hand on the issue of global warming like no other,
even as it rubberstamps drilling rights for Big Oil in pristine polar
bear habitat. If the federal government is really serious about
protecting the polar bear, then its next steps will be to cancel lease
sales in the Chukchi Sea and immediately implement a plan for deep cuts
in U.S. global warming pollution.”
Since the petition to protect polar bears under the Endangered Species
Act was first filed in February 2005, new science paints a dim picture
of the polar bear’s future. In September, the U.S. Geological Survey
predicted that two-thirds of the world’s polar bear population would
likely be extinct by 2050, including all polar bears within the United
States. Several leading scientists now predict the Arctic could be
ice-free in the summer by 2012.
Shrinking sea ice also drastically restricts polar bears’ ability to
hunt their main prey, ice seals. In the spring of 2006, scientists
located the bodies of several bears that had starved to death.
Unprecedented instances of polar bear cannibalism have also been
do*****ented along the north coast of Alaska and Canada.
Listing the species would guarantee that federal agencies will be
obligated to ensure that any action they authorize, fund, or carry out
will not jeopardize the polar bears’ continued existence or adversely
modify their critical habitat, and the Fish and Wildlife Service will
be required to prepare a recovery plan, specifying measures for the
bear’s protection. The government has received 670,000 comments in
support of protecting the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.
SOURCE: Center for Biological Diversity CONTACT: Kassie Siegel, CBD, CELL: (951) 961-7972, EMAIL: ksiegel@biologicaldiversity.org
Serena Ingre, NRDC CELL: (703) 296-0702 OFFICE: 202-289-2378 EMAIL: singre@nrdc.org
Jane Kochersperger, Greenpeace OFFICE: (202) 319-2493 CELL: 202-680-3798 WEB SITE:
http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/mammals/North_Pacific_right_whale/index.html.
|
|